CITCON Melbourne 2008 – Initial thoughts and impressions

Posted on Posted in Everything, Software Testing

So CITCON is done and dusted. I met a lot of really interesting people, some of them doing some very cool stuff. Saturday turned out to be a long-ish day and quite a fruitful one. I’m going to break down some of the stuff I picked up in the five sessions that I attended in another post, but I thought I’d post a couple of things while they’re fresh in my mind. There was quite a heavy automation focus, I suppose as you would expect at conference for continuous integration. I hadn’t spent a lot of time around people who do more automation than manual testing. Some of the opinions I heard were enlightening.

In a session on testing web apps, there was a demonstration using grails to quickly build a testing framework from which to build automated tests, as well as building a domain-specific language from the method level up to complete actions in the end-user’s natural language. One tester in the group said ‘this stuff blows my mind – are you guys testers or developers?’ – it became clear that the majority of the people in the room were developers. One of them said ‘we wouldn’t expect our testers to get this stuff. We might present them with a domain specific language to help them test it’ – and there was general assent from the other developers gathered.

I didn’t say anything at the time, but I thought it was a real shame that they felt the need to ‘dumb it down’ for the testers. There appeared to be the assumption that testers have not the skill to be able to handle something of this complexity. It made me wonder how widespread the assumption that ‘testing is a poor cousin of development’ goes. Of course, there is merit in being able to group such actions if testing those grouped actions were what you were trying to test, but there just seemed to be this implication that they deemed their testers incapable of doing anything more.

In another session, one participant wondered aloud how to get developers to do testing when testing was like doing the dishes. Developers were the cooks of the analogy and testers apparently the kitchen hands. I put my $0.02 in at this point and suggested that a) they ditch the ‘washing dishes’ analogy and b) that until the developers understood that testing was a highly cerebral task requiring a different mind set, then they probably wouldn’t be all that motivated to learn more about it.

It saddened me a little to think that there was such a wide comprehension gap between what some developers seem to think testing is, and what I understand testing to be. In my experience, good developers like to create things. They like to solve problems. They like the challenge of coming up with an elegant solution to something non-trivial.

Testing is not so dissimilar. We like to be creative too. We may have a different set of problems to create solutions for, but software testing is no less mentally taxing, or challenging. Developers tend to be thinking largely along the lines ‘how do I make this work’, whereas a tester’s mindset is more along the lines of ‘what could go wrong? What might happen that is unexpected and/or unwanted?’.

If you as a developer don’t see the merit in writing or performing tests, try asking yourself what might possibly go wrong with the code you’ve written. Ask a tester to read it – ask them what they think could go wrong with it. See what they come up with that you don’t. Oh, and if the answer you get is ‘Wow, I wouldn’t even know where to begin testing that’, then it might be time to do some refactoring 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *